Click here to stay in the archives
Click here to go back to ProFootballWeekly.com
spin.gif (1735 bytes)

Friday, March 30, 2001

reddot_nav.gif (103 bytes) Damon Huard
reddot_nav.gif (103 bytes) Ed Ellis
reddot_nav.gif (103 bytes) NFL bandana ban
 
    
ProFootballWeekly.com asked contributing editor Joel Buchsbaum for his thoughts on some of the hottest topics in the NFL.

 square.gif (826 bytes)

Patriots sign Damon Huard

PFW: What does this do for the Patriots’ offense?

Buchsbaum: Huard gives the Patriots a better backup than John Friesz was because he’s a much more mobile and athletic quarterback. What he’s got to do is learn to get rid of the ball quicker and make quicker decisions with the ball. As a thrower, he’s about average to slightly above-average, and he has adequate to above-average arm strength.

 square.gif (826 bytes)

Ed Ellis signed by San Diego

PFW: What implications does this signing have for the Chargers?

Buchsbaum: He’s a guy that’s been a tease. He’s got size. He’s got ability. But he’s never shown the competitiveness needed to be a solid NFL football player.

 square.gif (826 bytes)

NFL bans bandanas, other headwear

One new rule that has come out of the owners’ meetings, unlikely to be popular with many players, is a ban on bandanas. NFL disciplinarian Gene Washington attempted to get the ban passed several years ago, and this time it passed 30-1 (Oakland was against). The league ruled bandanas violate the uniform code, but skullcaps are OK as long as they bear the team logo and colors. "Uniform code rules start at the shoes and did not cover the head," McKay said, "and we were getting more diverse head coverings. We tried to bring that in line with other parts of the code. Now it covers the entire uniform."

PFW: What is your take on this decision?

Buchsbaum: I think the fact that is being overlooked — and the NFL has not publicized it because they believe it wouldn’t be a good idea — is the reason they’re getting rid of this is because very often, the do-rags, the bandanas and the colors they were in, were associated with gangs. Quite frankly, the NFL has quite a few players who either were or are still members of those gangs. In no way do they want to be perceived as supporting the gangs or encouraging the gangs, or letting their players do likewise. I think that was the overriding issue in the decision to ban them, and if it is, you can understand why.

vertical_bar.gif (672 bytes)

The Archives
2000 - 2001 Season

Online writers — features and columns by our PFW staff, columnists, AFC reporters, NFC reporters and contributing writers
College football — articles, college notepad, key college game previews, PFW's college top 10
Fantasy football — articles, injury reports, weekly fantasy tips, weekly matchups, The Fantasy Doctor, mock drafts, draft boards, "In our opinion" daily fantasy columns
Free-agency
General features — Internet features, features from our print edition, Hall of Fame features, team reports, training camp reports
Handicapper's Corner — staff selections, games of the week, PFW Players of the Week, NFL standings, weekly handicapping columns, predictions
"A closer look" — in-depth analysis of general football topics
"In our opinion" daily columns — opinions on general football topics
"PFW spins" — short-takes on current events
Joel Buchsbaum — college player evaluations, NFL player analysis, NFL draft coverage, NFL notepad, NFList, college game previews and other NFL articles by PFW's contributing editor
NFL Draft — player evaluations, printouts, feature stories, commentaries, draft recaps
Ron Pollack — articles and commentary by PFW's editor-in-chief
Season in review  — the 2000-2001 NFL season
XFL — the inaugural year

 

Thanks for visiting Pro Football Weekly's Archives at archive.profootballweekly.com

Click here to go to ProFootballWeekly.com Click here to return to our main site
ProFootballWeekly.com

© 1998-2002 by Pro Football Weekly, a Primedia publication. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is prohibited.