Click here to stay in the archives
Click here to go back to ProFootballWeekly.com
"In our opinion" daily columns

Monday, June 4, 2001

Newcomers galore

Patriots and Broncos both aggressive in free agency, but with different results

By Andy Hanacek, Associate editor

Did you ever win one of those shopping sprees where you’re given a certain amount of time to run through the store and grab as much as you can, regardless of the price? Well, I never have, nor have I seen one except on TV game shows, but I believe we are witnessing the equivalent in the NFL in the form of the Broncos’ and the Patriots’ free-agent expeditions. The difference is that the Broncos loaded their cart with moderate-priced but healthier and higher-quality ground beef, whereas the Patriots went straight for the easy, cheap TV dinners.

As of Sunday night, the Broncos had somehow managed to sign 17 free agents, re-sign 11 of their own free agents and give a multiyear extension to DT Trevor Pryce. The Patriots aren’t far behind, having signed 13 free agents, re-signing 11 of their own and giving QB Drew Bledsoe a multiyear extension.

Are Mike Shanahan, Scott Pioli and Bill Belichick all in cahoots, running two teams? I highly doubt that, simply because the directions these teams took in free agency were very different, despite the similarities in the strategies.

The Broncos are adding depth behind high-quality starters and trying to win now. The Patriots are rebuilding team chemisty and locker-room presence, as well as adding depth. But they needed to look more toward building a competitive all-around starting lineup.

One of the biggest questions here is: How are these two teams able to make all these moves? The Broncos were an estimated $5.7 million below the salary cap back in February, just before the start of the free-agency period. The Patriots were an estimated $2.9 million over the cap. The answer is simple, and twofold: Both teams cut high-priced players and signed better-quality players for rock-bottom prices.

First off, let’s look at the players the two teams either cut or just didn’t re-sign. The Broncos dumped high-priced veterans such as LB Glenn Cadrez and DT Keith Traylor and voided the contract of CB Ray Crockett. The Patriots followed the same general plan, cutting players such as OG Max Lane, CB Antonio Langham and LB Chris Slade. They also lost DT Chad Eaton, whose asking price was more than they wanted to pay.

After having followed a similar game plan to this point, the two teams then embarked on different strategies, with the Broncos looking as though they chose the right path.

The Broncos signed players who could make a difference and should be in their starting lineup — CB Denard Walker, DT-DE Leon Lett and DT Chester McGlockton. Plus, QB Steve Beuerlein could start if Brian Griese is injured, as he has been in past seasons.

The Patriots, however, added depth and character players as though they had just won the Super Bowl and were patching up holes. How else can you explain signing players such as backup QB Damon Huard, DE Anthony Pleasant, CB Terrance Shaw, LB-ST Larry Izzo and WR Torrance Small? Where were the Patriots when Walker, signed by Denver, was on the market?

I can understand the Patriots not going after Lett or McGlockton, given the team’s obsession with putting problem-free players in New England uniforms. That’s an honorable, dignified reason that I can respect. But Walker would have solved a major problem area for them without much (if any) baggage. Maybe $26 million over six years (plus a $4 million signing bonus) was out of their range, but you have to pay for quality, and Walker is a young enough player with whom to start building a defense.

Given the fact that the Pats will be moving into a new stadium in 2002, they could’ve taken a hit in payroll for a year, since they’ll probably more than make up for it two years from now with ticket sales. And you can’t even use the argument that they paid so much to Bledsoe that they couldn’t afford it, because the Broncos’ two major re-signings — Pryce and Griese — totaled more than the amount of Bledsoe’s extension per year.

Instead, the Patriots chose to build their depth first by offering the smallest possible amount to any free agent they pursued and loaded the deal with incentives. They didn’t completely focus on depth — they did sign FB Marc Edwards and WR Charles Johnson, who will both likely start — but the majority of the Patriots’ pickups seemed depth-related. Those are the types of signings that will get you to the playoffs later rather than sooner.

The Broncos had the right idea, and it will show in the next few years.

vertical_bar.gif (672 bytes)

The Archives
2000 - 2001 Season

Online writers — features and columns by our PFW staff, columnists, AFC reporters, NFC reporters and contributing writers
College football — articles, college notepad, key college game previews, PFW's college top 10
Fantasy football — articles, injury reports, weekly fantasy tips, weekly matchups, The Fantasy Doctor, mock drafts, draft boards, "In our opinion" daily fantasy columns
Free-agency
General features — Internet features, features from our print edition, Hall of Fame features, team reports, training camp reports
Handicapper's Corner — staff selections, games of the week, PFW Players of the Week, NFL standings, weekly handicapping columns, predictions
"A closer look" — in-depth analysis of general football topics
"In our opinion" daily columns — opinions on general football topics
"PFW spins" — short-takes on current events
Joel Buchsbaum — college player evaluations, NFL player analysis, NFL draft coverage, NFL notepad, NFList, college game previews and other NFL articles by PFW's contributing editor
NFL Draft — player evaluations, printouts, feature stories, commentaries, draft recaps
Ron Pollack — articles and commentary by PFW's editor-in-chief
Season in review  — the 2000-2001 NFL season
XFL — the inaugural year

 

Thanks for visiting Pro Football Weekly's Archives at archive.profootballweekly.com

Click here to go to ProFootballWeekly.com Click here to return to our main site
ProFootballWeekly.com

© 1998-2002 by Pro Football Weekly, a Primedia publication. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is prohibited.