Click here to stay in the archives
Click here to go back to ProFootballWeekly.com
Fantasy Profiles

Preseason 1999

Bettis looks like a risky bet

A lot of fantasy red flags surround the Steelers’ running back

By RON POLLACK, Editor-in-chief

Jerome Bettis is one of those players I am sure I would never select in a fantasy football draft this year.

I am not necessarily saying that he will be an enormous bust. Given Bettis’ bruising running style and head coach Bill Cowher’s strong belief in running the football, it would be silly to say that there is no chance of Bettis rebounding from last year’s subpar fantasy campaign.

That said, given how highly I see other people continuing to rate Bettis for their fantasy drafts, I just know that Bettis is a guy whom someone else will take before I do. The consensus of people I’ve talked to seems to rank Bettis at around the No. 12 spot on their RB draft boards.

The more I think about Bettis, the more he drops on my personal draft board. At this moment, he’s right around No. 20 on my draft board. The reason I have him rated lower than other people do is that I see an awful lot of red flags on Bettis.

Red Flag No. 1: 1998 stats

Bettis’ statistics last season are a definite red flag. He scored only three touchdowns. That kind of poor production undoubtedly crushed a lot of fantasy rosters he was a part of. Another ’98 stat that scares me is the fact that his rushing yards per carry plummeted to 3.8, way down from the 4.4 a year earlier. Now, you can’t just look at one year’s stats. If you do that, you’ll miss out on a ton of bounce-back players every season. There are other red flags, though, which is why I’m not predicting a fantasy bounce-back season for Bettis.

Red Flag No. 2: Offensive line

After so many years of having one of the league’s better offensive lines, the Steelers had problems in this area last season. The loss of John Jackson to free agency really hurt, especially since they had previously lost Leon Searcy to free agency too. Add to this the fact that Justin Strzelczyk is injured and out of the short-term picture (and perhaps out of the long-term picture), Will Wolford has retired, and the offensive line is a potential problem area. I’m not saying it’s impossible for the offensive line to turn things around since Dermontti Dawson is still the best center in the game and there is promising young talent, but "promising" also means "untested," so this makes me nervous about taking Bettis too soon.

Red Flag No. 3: The passing game

Kordell Stewart really struggled last season. I strongly believe that Stewart will go on to have a great pro career, but it now looks as though it will take some time. Plus, free agency has again taken a bite out of the Steelers’ receiving corps, with Charles Johnson moving on to Philadelphia. True, the Steelers used a first-round pick on WR Troy Edwards, but just like the offensive line, this means they are relying on unproven potential. If the passing game struggles, opposing defenses can load up against the run. You don’t like to see that happen to your fantasy running back.

Red Flag No. 4: Kordell in the red zone

It scares me that Bettis rushed for only three touchdowns last season at a time when Stewart ran for a lot fewer TDs than he did the year before. With Stewart’s red-zone scoring production in decline, I would have thought that would mean more opportunities for Bettis. Stewart is too much of a running weapon for me to believe he will be limited to a mere two rushing touchdowns again this season. After all, Stewart rushed for 11 and five touchdowns the two seasons before last year. Five is probably more realistic than 11 this season, but that would still mean red-zone scoring opportunities taken away from Bettis.

Summary

I’m not saying that Bettis will be a bad football player this year, but I have my concerns about him as a fantasy football player. If someone is going to take him as the No. 12 running back in a draft, it won’t be me. There are just too many red flags. If everyone in the draft is thinking the same way I am and he is left on the draft board much longer than expected, then I would be willing to take a flier on him as the first No. 3 running back in a 10-team league. But given Bettis’ high profile in fantasy football, I don’t think he’ll be plunging that significantly on Draft Day. Personally, I’d rather draft someone with more upside and fewer red flags in the spot where I anticipate Bettis will be taken. If Bettis has a big bounce-back season, I’ll be sure to tip my hat to the person who had the guts to draft him. More likely, though, I think I’ll be listening to someone complain later in the season that Bettis isn’t producing enough, at which point I’ll be thinking I’m glad I paid attention to the red flags.

Back to main page

If you don't see a player in our Internet edition, chances are you'll find a report on him in the print edition of Pro Football Weekly's Fantasy Football Guide '99. It's available at bookstores and newsstands across the country, or you can call 1-800-FOOTBALL (1-800-366-8225) to order a copy.

vertical_bar.gif (672 bytes)
Player index

Alexander, Derrick
Chief WR Alexander ready for a big season

Anderson, Jamal
The Fred Taylor-Jamal Anderson debate

Anthony, Reidel
Anthony, not Emanuel, is Bucs’ No. 1 receiving threat

Bettis, Jerome
Why the Steelers’ running back shouldn’t be selected as early as most draft boards would dictate

Biakabutuka, Tshimanga
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Blackwell, Will
Breaking down the Steeler wide receivers

Blake, Jeff
Blake is back, and fantasy owners should take notice

Blake, Jeff
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Bledsoe, Drew
Bledsoe’s contribution: consistency

Boston, David
Rising Arizona: Cardinal receivers look to make a fantasy impact

Brister, Bubby
Smith, McCaffrey should still produce under Brister

Bruce, Isaac
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Bruce, Isaac
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Brunell, Mark
Solving the riddle that is Mark Brunell

Chandler, Chris
Chandler won’t repeat career year

Collins, Kerry
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Conway, Curtis
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Conwell, Ernie
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Crockett, Zack
Raider running game doesn’t have much to offer

Davis, Terrell
One editor’s No. 1 choice: Fred Taylor

Davis, Terrell
The Fred Taylor-Jamal Anderson debate

Davis, Tyrone
Assessing several fantasy aberrations

Dawkins, Sean
Dawkins should help Galloway, Seahawk offense fly

Dillon, Corey
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Dudley, Rickey
Tricky Rickey: Dudley’s stock not determined by talent alone

Dyson, Kevin
Addition of FB Neal increases George’s fantasy value

Edwards, Troy
Breaking down the Steeler wide receivers

Emanuel, Bert
Anthony, not Emanuel, is Bucs’ No. 1 receiving threat

Enis, Curtis
Nowhere to go but up for Enis

Enis, Curtis
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Faulk, Marshall
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Flutie, Doug
Flutie may leave fantasy owners Buffaloed

Gadsden, Oronde
Assessing several fantasy aberrations

Galloway, Joey
Dawkins should help Galloway, Seahawk offense fly

Gannon, Rich
The ultimate QB sleeper — Rich Gannon

George, Eddie
Addition of FB Neal increases George’s fantasy value

Gonzalez, Tony
Chiefs’ Gonzalez ready to fulfill potential

Graham, Jay
Baltimore’s Holmes is not fantasy-starter material

Grbac, Elvis
Worn-out Warren: Moon’s fantasy football shine is gone

Green, Trent
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Hakim, Az-Zahir
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Harbaugh, Jim
How will Leaf’s mistakes affect Harbaugh?

Harrison, Marvin
Breakout season on tap for Harrison

Hawkins, Courtney
Breaking down the Steeler wide receivers

Henley, June
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Hicks, Skip
Reasons not to pick Hicks

Hicks, Skip
Assessing several fantasy aberrations

Hill, Greg
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Hill, Madre
Wide awake: Former supersleeper Staley ready to make a splash

Hoard, Leroy
Hoard’s numbers aren’t entirely of his own making

Hoard, Leroy
Assessing several fantasy aberrations

Holcombe, Robert
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Holmes, Priest
Baltimore’s Holmes is not fantasy-starter material

Holt, Torry
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Irvin, Michael
The Playmaker wasn’t exactly the Moneymaker in fantasy ’98

Johnson, Keyshawn
Jet-powered: Fantasy lineups look better with Keyshawn Johnson

Kaufman, Napoleon
Raider running game doesn’t have much to offer

Kirby, Terry
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Lee, Amp
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Lewis, Jermaine
Assessing several fantasy aberrations

Manning, Peyton
Manning will be better in ’99 — sort of

Martin, Curtis
Jet set: Martin’s stock could be on the rise

Mathis, Terance
Without Martin, look for Mathis to slide

McCaffrey, Ed
Smith, McCaffrey should still produce under Brister

McNair, Steve
Addition of FB Neal increases George’s fantasy value

Moon, Warren
Worn-out Warren: Moon’s fantasy football shine is gone

Moore, Rob
Rising Arizona: Cardinal receivers look to make a fantasy impact

Owens, Terrell
Owens emerging as a fantasy force

Proehl, Ricky
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Riemersma, Jay
Assessing several fantasy aberrations

Rhett, Errict
Looking to maximize your fantasy football portfolio? Try these low-risk investments

Rhett, Errict
Baltimore’s Holmes is not fantasy-starter material

Salaam, Rashaan
Raider running game doesn’t have much to offer

Sanders, Frank
Rising Arizona: Cardinal receivers look to make a fantasy impact

Smith, Antowain
Buffalo’s Smith is the anti-risk pick

Smith, Emmitt
Too legit to quit on Emmitt

Smith, Rod
Smith, McCaffrey should still produce under Brister

Staley, Duce
Wide awake: Former supersleeper Staley ready to make a splash

Stewart, Kordell
Steelers’ Stewart will bounce back

Stewart, Kordell
Why RB Jerome Bettis shouldn’t be selected as early as most draft boards would dictate

Taylor, Fred
One editor’s No. 1 choice: Fred Taylor

Taylor, Fred
Solving the riddle that is Mark Brunell

Taylor, Fred
The Fred Taylor-Jamal Anderson debate

Thigpen, Yancey
Addition of FB Neal increases George’s fantasy value

Toomer, Amani
Assessing several fantasy aberrations

Van Dyke, Alex
Breaking down the Steeler wide receivers

Ward, Hines
Breaking down the Steeler wide receivers

Warner, Kurt
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Wilkins, Jeff
The Ram offense appears to be vastly improved, but fantasy owners should approach with caution

Back to Fantasy Football Zone archives

 

Thanks for visiting Pro Football Weekly's Archives at archive.profootballweekly.com

Click here to go to ProFootballWeekly.com Click here to return to our main site
ProFootballWeekly.com

© 1998-2001 by Pro Football Weekly, a Primedia publication. All rights reserved. Reproduction without permission is prohibited.